Microsoft released fixes and it seems that currently ReFS, does not need additional RAM vs our normal recommendations compared to NTFS, at least for most cases, but it takes time for this to be proven in the field and we've only recently become comfortable that this best practice recommendation can be dropped (although there's still some evidence it might not hurt for Windows 2019) This is especially true in a case like this where the recommendation comes from cases where ReFS was consuming significant amounts of kernel memory and it was clearly observed that customers with more RAM had much greater success than those with minimal RAM. These practices are based on what is observed by customers, not some cooked up lab testing, but they can, and will, change over time, especially when vendors make changes that address issues. Best practices are not the same as requirements, they are recommendations on how to do something so that it works "best" in a given circumstance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |